Summary
The performance comparison between varianta_parallel
and variantb_g1
reveals several key insights. The overall build time for variantb_g1
is longer by approximately 55 seconds (6% increase) compared to varianta_parallel
. Notably, the DexMergingTask
and AggregateDepsTask
show significant time increases in variantb_g1
, suggesting areas where performance optimizations could be targeted.
In task execution, variantb_g1
generally exhibits longer times across most tasks, particularly in Kotlin compilation tasks like :layer_0:module_0_10:kspDebugKotlin
, which is about 7% slower in variantb_g1
. Memory usage is slightly higher in variantb_g1
by about 0.3 GB, aligning with the increased build times and task durations observed.
The garbage collection logs indicate a similar number of total collections between the variants, suggesting that garbage collection overhead does not significantly differ between them. The Kotlin Build Reports highlight a slower performance in variantb_g1
across various metrics, including compiler initialization, IR generation, and code generation, which corroborates the observed longer build times.
Detailed Report
1. Build Time Comparison
Mean Build Time:
varianta_parallel
: 914.496 secondsvariantb_g1
: 969.364 seconds- Difference:
variantb_g1
is slower by 54.868 seconds (6% increase).
P50 Build Time:
varianta_parallel
: 913.022 secondsvariantb_g1
: 965.146 seconds- Difference:
variantb_g1
is slower by 52.124 seconds.
P90 Build Time:
varianta_parallel
: 936.113 secondsvariantb_g1
: 995.622 seconds- Difference:
variantb_g1
is slower by 59.509 seconds.
2. Task Type Differences
- Top 3 Time-Consuming Tasks:
"DexMergingTask"
:varianta_parallel
mean time is 4286 ms,variantb_g1
mean time is 5422 ms."AggregateDepsTask"
:varianta_parallel
mean time is 3033 ms,variantb_g1
mean time is 3782 ms."KotlinCompile"
:varianta_parallel
mean time is 2284 ms,variantb_g1
mean time is 2349 ms.
3. Statistical Patterns
- Significant timing variations are observed in
"DexMergingTask"
and"AggregateDepsTask"
, withvariantb_g1
performing slower by approximately 26% and 25% respectively.
4. CPU & Memory Usage Analysis
Overall System Usage:
- CPU usage is maxed at 100% for both variants.
- Memory usage peaks at 14.13 GB for
varianta_parallel
and 14.43 GB forvariantb_g1
.
Main Gradle Process:
- CPU peaks at 96.04% for
varianta_parallel
and 96.44% forvariantb_g1
. - Memory peaks at 7.01 GB for
varianta_parallel
and 7.45 GB forvariantb_g1
.
- CPU peaks at 96.04% for
5. Garbage Collection Analysis
- Total GC Collections:
varianta_parallel
: 198 collections.variantb_g1
: 197 collections.
6. Kotlin Build Reports Analysis
- Compiler Performance Metrics:
variantb_g1
shows consistently slower performance across compiler initialization, IR generation, and code generation stages.- Code generation lines per second are 1330 for
varianta_parallel
and 1287 forvariantb_g1
.
7. Summary
variantb_g1
generally exhibits slower performance across most metrics compared to varianta_parallel
. This includes longer build times, slower task execution times, slightly higher memory usage, and reduced efficiency in Kotlin compiler performance. These insights suggest potential areas for optimization, particularly in the DexMergingTask
and AggregateDepsTask
.